Saturday, November 29, 2008

Ford Mustang: 1974-1978



Ford Mustang: 1974-1978

The wild horse becomes a tame pony

By the end of 1973, the once-mighty Mustang was on the ropes. The ponycar segment was crowded with rivals from General Motors, American Motors, Chrysler and even Mercury. Also, with increased gas prices, the demand for big, powerful, clumsy dragsters was shrinking.

Recipe for Change
Ford President Lee Iacocca, who had fathered the original 1964 model, viewed these obstacles as opportunities, a chance to return to the Mustang's roots of an inexpensive sporty car that was practical as well as fun. How successful he was is open to debate.

The trouble with trying to re-create the successful Mustang recipe was that the raw ingredients had changed. The 1964 Mustang had been heavily based on the Falcon, Ford's low-end economy car. The 1974 Mustang II was based on the Pinto econo-box, and it was not the promising starting point the Falcon had been. The Pinto was a sturdy and porky little tin can (sometimes ignitable) with generic four and six-cylinder engines.

Mustang II
Iacocca wanted to scale up the Pinto into the new Mustang II to fill the sporty sedan niche occupied by the Toyota Celica, one of the new breed of hot Japanese 2+2s catching the attention of Detroit executives. Essentially, Ford decided the old ponycar market was too small to worry about, and besides the fancier Mavericks already had V-8 engines and were selling reasonably well.


The Pinto was beefed up to use the heavier-duty parts needed for the Mustang II, but the new pony had more insulation to help control the vibration of the base 2.3-liter four-cylinder engine. The 1974 Mustang II was much smaller than the 1973 model, and no convertible was offered. The accent was on flash, not performance, but at least the new 'Stang had rack-and-pinion steering for the first time. The sportiest Mustang II was the fastback, with the notchback aimed at luxury-oriented buyers. Ford had acquired Ghia, an established Italian body builder with a proven reputation, but the opportunity to make good use of its talents was squandered when the name was frivolously attached to a trim package on the notchback.

Performance Push
Old-time Mustang fans were crying for a performance version with ponycar looks, so the Mach I was introduced. This was a V-6-powered fastback with a striping package and fancy wheels. The first-year reception for the Mustang II was impressive, with 386,000 sales. But after the novelty wore off, the Mustang II began to slide.


The new Mustang was heavy at 2,700 pounds, and the engines it was saddled with didn't deliver much power or gas mileage compared to the import competition. For 1975, a 302-inch V-8 was added, but with only 122 horses it was hardly what Ford fans needed to do battle with the Camaro Z-28 and Firebird.

The Ghia models had vinyl roofs, opera windows and crushed velour upholstery. Sales dipped to 190,000 units as the Japanese imports streaked ahead and Camaro and Firebird sales (combined) surpassed their old rival at last. The Mustang II was also competing with the Ford Maverick, which was selling almost as well. However, Ford took comfort in knowing that the Mustang II easily outsold the equally wimpy Chevy Monza aimed at the same market.

Kinda Cobra
The Cobra name was dredged out in 1976 and slapped on a trim package that was sure to anger diehard Shelby fans. White with blue stripes and black with gold stripes were the only paint options, and although the Cobra was the best looking Mustang II variant, it was still as slow as molasses.


Although there would be no convertible Mustang II, in 1978 a T-top option was added to the fastback bodystyle. By this time the V-8 Mustang II weighed over 3,200 pounds and the tepid 302 could not make it a respectable runner. Nevertheless, Ford added a King Cobra model in 1978, with a beefed-up suspension, better wheels, brushed aluminum interior trim and wild Cobra graphics sporting a pop-art snake on the hood. Sales continued to slip until the final year of Mustang II production, when sales rallied to 192,410 units.

Due to their bulk and lack of muscle, few Mustang IIs were raced. Some were beefed up with bigger engines, but it made more sense to start with a first-generation Mustang that weighed around 200 pounds less. The Mustang II was no match for a base-model Camaro on a race track, much less a Z-28. One of the few Mustang IIs to hit the track was the Kemp Cobra II run in the IMSA All-American GT racing series in 1976. It used a custom-built space frame that bore no resemblance to the Mustang unibody, and was powered by a 530-horse 351 Cleveland V-8. Builder Charlie Kemp also advertised a hotter street version of the Mustang II, called the Kemp GT, that was to have upgraded suspension and interior with a replica of the racecar body.


By 1978 the Mustang II was ripe for replacement. It had kept the Mustang name alive through some tough times for the American auto industry, and for thousands of buyers it provided stylish, individualistic transportation at a fair price. But for performance fans it was a sheep in wolf's clothing and no match for their rivals in the Bowtie Brigade. That situation would get much better when the new 'Stang came knocking in 1979.

The Mustang kicks back

From 1964 to 1966 the Mustang fired up the ponycar fad and blasted sales records for a new car introduction. Except for a weak challenge from the first-generation Barracuda, the Mustang had the sporty sedan genre all to itself, but in 1967 that would change as General Motors introduced its Camaro and Firebird models to take it on. Ford knew it would have to come up with a new car to meet the challenge, but without breaking the bank.

Raging Horse
The 1967 Mustang was significantly upgraded, being slightly longer, wider and heavier than the 1964-1966 models. To make up for the extra heft, Ford added to the option list a big-block 390-inch V-8 with 320 raging horses. This heavy engine added straight-line speed (0-60 in 7.5 seconds), but took a toll in handling. The previous six-cylinder and 289-inch V-8s were still offered as well.
The body was completely restyled, but still unmistakably a Mustang. The long hood/short deck styling was retained, along with the gaping grill and side scoops. Once again there were three body styles. The hardtop remained the best seller, but the fastback passed the convertible to take second place. The new model was handsome and handled better due to a wider track, but the Mustang now had fearsome competitors.

Serious Comp
The 1967 Chevy Camaro and Pontiac Firebird were new designs based on Chevy II parts. They were slightly heavier than the Mustang, but had more powerful engines. The 327 and 350 engines were proven performance mills, and the 375-hp Chevy 396 was hotter than Ford's 390. And the Camaro 302 Z-28 engine was to prove superior to the Ford 289 in Trans-Am racing.


The Firebird was basically the same car as the Camaro, but with a technically advanced overhead cam six as standard, with 326 and 400-inch engines that were an even match for the Mustang motors. Plymouth revamped the Barracuda with slick new bodywork, but the old 273-inch V-8 was on the weak side. Even Mercury was itching to take a shot at the pony with its new Mustang-based Cougar. Shelby American continued building the GT350 versions of the Mustang and added the GT500, which was powered by a massive 428-inch Ford V-8.

Staying Ahead
With such a crowded field, it is no wonder that Mustang sales were off from previous years, with "only" 472,121 sold in 1967. The Camaro was a comparatively distant second at 220,917, besting the Cougar (123,672), the Firebird (82,560) and the Barracuda (62,534). Although the Mustang was still the king, it was obvious things were going to get tougher. Production of the Shelby models was shifted to Ford, and they began to lose their performance edge.


For 1968 Ford made few changes, adding an optional 390-hp 427 engine to counter the 396 threat (just in time for Chevy to add a 427 of its own). There were also a number of minor body trim changes, including a deeply inset grill and rear quarter panels with integrated side scoops. A large number of safety features were added as well, such as a padded instrument panel and an energy-absorbing steering column. But times were getting tougher and 1968 sales slipped to 317,404 units. The AMC Javelin entered the ponycar frey, but never managed much in total sales.

Big Boss
Ford responded to the faster Camaro and Firebird models with a major Mustang revamp. The 1969 model was restyled and the suspension upgraded. The hardtop, fastback and convertible models were highlighted by special versions like the Grande, Mach I and Boss 302. The Grande was a luxury hardtop with a vinyl roof, fake wood trim and extra insulation. The Mach 1 featured the new 351-inch engine and had the famous "shaker" scoop that projected through the hood. Also new for 1969 was the very hot Boss 302, styled by Larry Shinoda and equipped with an excellent 302. The 1970 Boss was also offered with a 429-inch V-8, while the Mach I got the 428. The de-clawed Shelby Mustangs drew their last gasp in 1970, but by then they were so far from their original intent it could have been considered a mercy killing. Despite the improvements, and winning the 1970 Trans-Am championship, Mustang sales dropped from 299,824 in 1969 to 190,727 in 1970.

Sales Slip
With sales falling, Ford made major changes to the 1971 Mustangs. The new model was longer, wider and over 600 pounds heavier than a 1965 model. There were still a bewildering number of engine options, including a 200-inch six, and three V-8s: a 302, 351 and 429. The Boss 302 became the Boss 351, and the Mach 1 was equipped with the 429 Cobra Jet engine developing 370 hp. Actually, the Boss 351 was much better balanced and a touch faster than its big brother.


The ponycar fad had run its course and, although the Mustang still outsold its competitors, only 149,678 Mustangs were sold in 1971 and 125,093 the next year. The 1973 Mustang was a carryover from 1972, and little was changed except that the best car in the lineup, the Boss 351, was dropped. Ford announced that the 1973 Mustang convertible would be its last ragtop, and this accounted for sales going up to 134,867 units as collectors reached for their pocketbooks.

Clearly something had to be done. The Mustang had become too big, too expensive and did not provide enough fun to survive in a gas and emission-conscious world. In our next installment, we'll see how the Mustang II temporarily increased sales, but lost the lead to Camaro. Stay tuned.

Ford Mustang: 1964-1966



Ford Mustang: 1964-1966

Father of the ponycar

Harold Pace / autoMedia.com

In 1964 the American car scene didn't have too many stars. The expensive Corvette held sway at Chevrolet, but the much-hyped Corvair had more potential than performance. The lovely Avanti had generated reams of publicity, but Studebaker was too busy treading water to take advantage of it. The 409 Impalas, 427 Galaxies and Hemi-powered Chryslers were wicked in a straight line, but expensive gas guzzlers that rumbled like volcanos and stubbornly refused to either stop or turn corners. As a result they sold in insignificant numbers by Detroit standards. The Falcon, Valiant and Chevy II were selling respectably, but their austere "econo car" image did not appeal to younger drivers. All that changed with the Ford Mustang.

Iococca Concept
The Mustang was the brainchild of Lee Iococca, who at 35 had already become a Ford vice president and general manager. He was concerned that Ford was stuck with an aging buyer pool for its lackluster sedans inherited from beancounter Robert McNamara's stewardship. Iococca immediately got Ford back into racing with the Ford GT program, drag racing and NASCAR. He dropped a V-8 into the Falcon to create the sporty Falcon Futura, but what he really wanted was a "personal car" for younger drivers more interested in peeling out in a fun, sporty car than poking around in their parents' sedans. After a series of concept cars, the parameters were laid out.

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

And then... november


And then... november
Originally uploaded by emiguez65

asphyxiate


asphyxiate
Originally uploaded by horizontal.integration

A sense of symmetry...


A sense of symmetry...
Originally uploaded by Ryan Eng
Explore #91 on Nov 25, 2008. Domo Arigato Mr Robotos.

View Large On Black Background.

After a weekend of rainy, cloudy gray skies it was nice to shoot something with out a cloud in the sky. This was taken about 15 minutes after sunset at the Ko'olina marina boat harbor. There's a handful of million dollar boats here. I'm not sure what this building is for but I loved the architecture.

HDR made from 7 exposures then digitally blended 3 other exposures to touch up the sky and lights. I felt it would look better perfectly symmetrical so I just copied the left side, flipped it horrizontally, and positioned it on the right side. Applied a layer for curves, saturation, did a bit of highlight / dodge, and a small unsharp mask on the building.

The original shot with out the symmetrical flip is below.

romanesca


romanesca
Originally uploaded by santacrewsgirl
romanesca

feeling a little better...

Chrysalis


Chrysalis
Originally uploaded by Kamuro

Good Morning SoCal


Good Morning SoCal
Originally uploaded by AAGCTT
Good Morning SoCal

Pasadena, California.

Walking Trail Closed :: HDR


Saturday, September 20, 2008

Allegheny County Airport: Runway 28


Allegheny County Airport: Runway 28
Originally uploaded by shutterrudder.

Allegheny County Airport: Runway 28

KAGC Airport just south of Pittsburgh. 6500 foot long runway. Home to many corporate and charter operaters. www.avphotographics.com

Uploaded by shutterrudder on 25 Jul 08, 10.02AM CDT.

Fairchild Metro 23 Cockpit


Fairchild Metro 23 Cockpit
Originally uploaded by ScenicAviator.